CITIZENS TAKE BACK SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY

CITIZENS TAKE BACK SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY
IN THE OREGON SUPREME COURT

This is the really important thing...it is the nexus of the whole scam...statutes are not laws...this is SO important for everyone to see what is in this motion...we have criminally convicted the Oregon Supreme Court and lower courts now, on the Record, in their own courtrooms...we confronted the shadow government openly in the Oregon Supreme Court...we have this on videotape also...this in turn confronts the global agenda as it is being put in place...you should know about what we are doing here in Oregon.

JUDGE SAYS, "I CANNOT ANSWER THAT," WHEN ASKED IF THE OREGON SUPREME COURT IS A COURT OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL DUE PROCESS

August 9, 2000 - Salem, Oregon: No one stood when the Bailiff announced, "All rise for the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon," as the en banc judges quietly took their seats. Petitioners Pamela Gaston and Michael Marsh sat at the table, and Attorney General representative Wasserman, there to defend the STATE OF OREGON, sat at the other table. A packed courtroom of Citizens' rights advocates, Constitutional defenders and angry courtwatchers witnessed for the People, ex rel, in the hearing. As the crowd gathered outside of the Supreme Court before the hearing, two imposing State Police officers arrived to monitor the court proceedings. As they came through the crowd, one said, "Mr. Gaston," and shook Will Gaston's hand. Whereas in previous court proceedings the judges and sheriffs create chaos and attack the courtwatchers, the mood for this hearing was nothing but respectful of the People.

Pamela Gaston stepped to the lectern and asked which of the four judges would be the presiding judge for the hearing. Judges Carson, VanHoomison and Gillette previously recused themselves, and Chief Justice Carson was seen scurrying away from the Supreme Court Building as the hearing was soon to begin.

Judge Durham stated that he would be the presiding judge. Gaston asked Judge Durham, "Is this a Constitutional Court of Judicial Due Process?" and Durham replied "You are in the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon." Pamela Gaston asked, "Is that court a Constitutional Court of Judicial Due Process?" and judge Durham responded, "I CANNOT ANSWER THAT." Gaston and Marsh were 'allowed' seven minutes to speak, then the Attorney General had an opportunity to rebut and defend the STATE, then Pamela Gaston rebutted the AG 'defense.' Gaston ran through the high points from the following Motion, which is attached after this article. The Motion fully makes the case, and the exhibits which are referred to are attached in the Motion.

Pamela Gaston made an oral record of the fraud and deception of the Oregon government, the history of this corruption, and the plans outlined for our future to be sold to the global sovereignty and enslaved to a Corporate Global Socialism, which they have entrenched already and are relentlessly moving forward to enact at this time.

Pamela Gaston told the four judges that they were knowingly involved in the corruption, as she knew personally that for more than two years they have knowingly and actively been protecting child pornographers and black market child-selling agents for the state, and numerous corrupt judges in the lower courts.
The Attorney General had been forced to appear by the Supreme Court, having filed a motion that they did not intend to appear. AG Wasserman, red-faced and quiet, to the point that no one could hear him in the audience, was asked by Judge Riggs in as many words, "Why did this initiative not get blocked sooner in the certification process?" It was blatant that the Supreme Court judges were amazed that they were having to face this open confrontation about their whole "secret" government, from which they profit, laid out bare before them.

The Attorney General's office had not one word of defense, nor did he dispute one word from the whole Motion, as follows. The bottom line in a courtroom is that undisputed testimony becomes fact, and that was his time to refute these claims and this evidence. There was no dispute. AG Wasserman weakly argued that the ballot could not be enacted, that it was not clear in its intent, and how the Attorney General office would decide whether it was enforceable, under the amended VII authority.

Gaston made a searing rebuttal stating that the AG pleading was "LUDICROUS," that the AG statements that their office would determine whether an initiative was enforceable or not, according to the Amended VII authority, when Gaston had just destroyed the whole authority that he was attempting to impose. Gaston ended the rebuttal telling the judges that, "If it is not Constitutional it is TREASON. Thank you."

The Attorney General and the Justice Dept. gave no factual dispute and now the evidence as presented is fact in the Record of the Court and in the Public Record of the People.

Another facet of court procedure is "false in part is thrown out" in a court of credible evidence. This Record has now factually discredited the authority on which the whole statutory government has been built and, once discredited, it cannot stand. The People, with one voice, declared that our sovereignty WILL STAND and not these corrupted courts, and now the Amended VII no longer exists. The only place these corrupt Public Servants and their statutory rules have any authority any more is in the MINDS of the People who fear them!!! FEAR NOT from now on, Oregon. We have collectively broken open the LIE to the LIGHT of the PUBLIC EYE. Challenge your abusers every time they violate your Constitutional rights. They do not have a leg to stand on anymore in Oregon--NO WHERE TO HIDE FROM NOW ON.

Source of this article.

Yahoo group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CCCC-USA/

P.S. Pamela K Gaston died in her sleep the morning of 12/20/04, the day after posting this article.